A universal guide for China studiesChinese Literature - Historiography |
Encoding: Unicode (UTF-8) [Location: HOME > Literature > Historical critics > Shitong][bottom]
Shitong 史通 "All about Historiography" by Liu Zhiji 劉知幾 | Literature by A to Z Literature by time Literature by theme | ||
Liu Zhiji 劉知幾 (d. 721) was the first historian of China who wrote about historiography. His book Shitong describes the general pattern of the official dynastic historiography that was in use since the Western Han Dynasty. He develops standards, but he also criticizes the styles and composition techniques of older historians. The chapters are:
| |||
6.列傳 夫紀傳之興,肇於史漢。蓋紀者,編年也。傳者,列事也。 編年者,歷帝王之歲月,猶春秋之經。列事者,錄人臣之行狀,猶春秋之傳。春秋則傳以解經,史漢傳以釋紀。 尋茲例草創。如項王宜傳,而以本紀為名。非唯羽之僭盜不可同於天子。且推其序事,皆作傳言。求謂之紀,不可得也。 夫紀傳之不同,猶詩賦之有別,而後來繼作,亦多所未詳。案范曄漢書,紀后妃六宮。其實傳也,而謂之為紀。陳壽國志載孫劉二帝。其實紀也,而呼之曰傳。 考數家之所作,其未達紀傳之情乎。 Ordinary Biographies The historiographical style of imperial "arranged" biographies (ji) and ordinary "down-handed" biographies (zhuan) was first used for the Records of the Great Historian (Shiji) and the Book of Han (Hanshu). "To arrange" means, to tie years together (bian nian). "To hand down" means, to collect events in a line. "Tieing years together" means, to put the years and months of an emperor's or a king's rule in calendrical order, like it is done in the Classic Spring and Autumn Annals (Chunqiu jing). "To collect events in a line" means, to report deeds and conducts of ordinary persons and ministers, like it is done in the Spring and Autumn Tradition of Zuo (Zuozhuan; often seen as a commentary to the Spring and Autumn annals). The Spring and Autumn annals have commentaries (zhuan) to explain the Classic (jing), and likewise the Shiji and Hanshu have ordinary biographies (zhuan) to interpret the imperial biographies (ji). Inquiring the writings according to these rules, one will find that they are not followed very well... For instance, for the hegemonial king Xiang Yu, an ordinary biography would suit better, although his biography was entitled as imperial biography. It was not right to list him, an usurper of the throne, side by side with the Sons of Heaven. He should better be put in the right place and overall made an ordinary biography. Seeking to make him an imperial biography, was not right... The difference between imperial and ordinary biographies is the same kind of distinction as that of rhapsodies and regular poems. But later, people continued to disrespect this difference, like Fan Ye when he wrote the History of (Later) Han (Hou Han shu). he wrote a collective biography for the imperial consorts, but what actually should be an ordinary biography, he called an imperial biography. Chen Shou, recording the reigns of the emperors Sun (of Wu) and Liu (of Shu) in the Records of the Three Kingdoms, what actually should be imperial biographies, he called ordinary biographies. Examining what numerous scholars have written, we see that they barely employ the real character of imperial and ordinary biographies. |